Estimated Reading Time: 15–17 minutes

Grief is often spoken about as though it were a journey with a recognizable destination. People are encouraged to “move forward,” “find closure,” or eventually “let go,” and although these phrases are usually offered with kindness, they can create an unintended burden. A grieving person may begin to wonder whether they are mourning incorrectly because they still think about the person who died, continue to feel waves of sadness years later, or do not feel ready to transform their loss into a reassuring story. In reality, grief rarely follows such a tidy path. It can involve yearning, sadness, anger, guilt, relief, numbness, tenderness, confusion, memory, physical exhaustion, and moments of ordinary pleasure, sometimes within the same day. The American Psychological Association describes grief as involving emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and physiological experiences, underscoring how much more it is than sadness alone.

This complexity is one reason creative expression can be particularly valuable in grief work. Loss can leave people with experiences that are difficult to organize into ordinary language. A widow may understand intellectually that her husband has died while still reaching toward his side of the bed in the morning. A child may be unable to explain what it means that a parent is gone but may draw the family repeatedly with the deceased parent still standing among them. Someone grieving a sibling may feel both devastated by the death and angry about unresolved conflicts, yet feel guilty admitting that anger aloud. Art allows contradictions like these to exist together without demanding immediate explanation.

Art therapy does not require a grieving person to make their loss beautiful, find a lesson in it, or arrive at emotional closure. Instead, the creative process can provide a place to give grief shape, color, texture, movement, and symbolic form. A person can create something that represents what cannot yet be said, preserve a memory that matters, externalize anger that feels frightening, or explore how a relationship continues internally after death. The American Art Therapy Association identifies grief and major life transitions among the circumstances in which art therapy may be particularly useful.

The therapeutic aim is not necessarily to help someone “finish grieving.” It is often to help them develop a way of living with the reality of the loss while remaining connected to their memories, relationships, values, and continuing life.

What You Will Learn

In this article, you will learn:

• Why contemporary grief psychology does not require people to detach completely from those they have lost.

• How art therapy can provide expression when grief is difficult to put into words.

• How memory work, symbolic art, collage, letters, containers, and visual journals can support bereavement.

• Why continuing bonds can be more meaningful than forcing emotional closure.

• How creative work can make room for contradictory emotions such as love, anger, guilt, relief, and longing.

• How therapists can use art without pressuring clients to find meaning or “heal” according to a predetermined timeline.

• Why the goal of grief work may be integration rather than erasure.

Grief Is Not a Problem to Solve

Grief begins with a profound contradiction: someone or something has disappeared from external reality while remaining psychologically present. The person who died may no longer walk through the door, answer the phone, sit at the dinner table, or send a familiar message, yet their presence continues through memory, habit, attachment, imagination, identity, family stories, and countless ordinary associations. A particular song can suddenly bring them close. A familiar perfume can create a physical sensation of recognition. A sentence may appear in the mind in their voice. Years after a death, someone may still instinctively think, I need to tell her about this.

These experiences do not necessarily indicate that someone has failed to accept reality. They reflect the fact that important relationships become woven into psychological life. Bereavement requires adaptation to an external absence while the internal relationship continues to change. Contemporary grief scholarship has increasingly challenged older assumptions that successful mourning requires severing emotional bonds with the deceased. The continuing bonds perspective, introduced prominently by Klass, Silverman, and Nickman (1996), emphasized that maintaining an internal relationship with someone who has died can form part of ordinary bereavement rather than representing a failure to “move on.” Later research has shown that continuing bonds are complex rather than uniformly beneficial or harmful, with their impact depending on how they are experienced and integrated into the person's life.

This distinction matters enormously in therapeutic work. A client who keeps her mother's scarf, speaks to her while driving, or continues cooking one of her recipes every birthday does not necessarily need to be encouraged to stop. The more useful question is whether the continuing connection helps the person carry the relationship into present life or whether it is associated with severe distress, avoidance, or an inability to engage with reality. Research has suggested that different forms of continuing bonds may relate differently to adaptation, emphasizing the need to understand their meaning rather than treating attachment to the deceased as inherently pathological.

Art therapy fits naturally within this understanding because artwork can become a place where memory and present reality coexist. A person can create an image of someone who has died while simultaneously acknowledging their absence. They can preserve something, alter it, revisit it, or allow it to remain unfinished. The artwork does not have to resolve the contradiction. It can simply hold it.

Why Words Can Feel Insufficient in Grief

People often struggle to answer the apparently simple question, “How are you feeling?” after a significant loss. Sometimes they genuinely do not know. Sometimes the available emotional vocabulary feels inadequate. Saying “sad” may barely capture an experience that also includes disbelief, fear, anger, loneliness, guilt, exhaustion, resentment, love, relief, and longing.

There may also be experiences the grieving person is reluctant to verbalize. A caregiver whose parent endured a long illness might feel relieved that the suffering has ended and then become ashamed of that relief. Someone whose marriage was complicated may grieve deeply while also remembering betrayal, conflict, or resentment. A child may be furious at the parent who died, not because they misunderstand death, but because emotionally the death can still feel like abandonment. A person grieving a miscarriage may feel devastated by a relationship and future that others never had the opportunity to see.

Visual art can create a third space between silence and direct verbal disclosure. A client does not have to begin with the sentence, “I am angry with my father for dying.” They might first cover a page in heavy black charcoal, press hard enough to tear the paper, and then sit quietly looking at what has emerged. The therapist can approach the image through curiosity rather than interpretation: What was it like making this? Which part feels most important? Where would you begin if the picture could speak?

The image may eventually lead into language, but language does not need to be the first step. In this sense, art is not merely decoration added to talking therapy. It can function as another form of psychological communication. Research on visual art modalities in bereavement has suggested that creative approaches may help people externalize and engage with grief experiences, although the evidence base remains smaller and more methodologically varied than research on some established psychotherapies.

That qualification is important. Art therapy should not be presented as a guaranteed treatment for grief, nor should every grieving person be encouraged to make art. Some people process loss primarily through conversation, ritual, movement, faith, solitude, relationships, writing, or practical action. Creative work is one pathway among many, and its value lies partly in giving clients another language when ordinary speech feels constrained.

Creating an Image of the Grief Rather Than the Person

When people hear “grief art,” they may imagine drawing a portrait of the person who died. Portraiture can certainly be meaningful, but it is only one possibility. Sometimes asking someone to depict the deceased directly feels too painful, too literal, or too technically demanding. An alternative is to invite the person to represent the grief itself.

The prompt might be simple: If your grief had a shape, texture, landscape, or weather pattern, what would it look like today? The word “today” matters because grief changes. A person's image six weeks after a death may be entirely different from one created a year later, and neither should be treated as a more advanced stage.

One client might paint a dense blue-black circle occupying almost the entire page, with a tiny opening along one side. Another may produce chaotic red and gray lines spreading in multiple directions. Someone else may create an almost empty page with a faint shape near the bottom. The therapist does not need a symbolic dictionary telling them what blue, red, empty space, circles, or lines mean. The client's own relationship to the image is more important than any universal interpretation.

The person who created the black circle might say, “It feels like everything else in my life is happening around this hole.” Another might describe their chaotic lines as “everyone needing something from me when I can barely think.” An almost empty page might represent numbness rather than peace. By asking rather than assuming, the therapist allows meaning to emerge from the client's lived experience.

This exercise can also reveal something important about how grief occupies psychological space. A client may notice that the grief takes up the entire page and suddenly recognize how little room has been available for anything else. That realization should not automatically lead to the goal of making the grief smaller. Instead, later work might explore whether the page itself could become larger. Perhaps the question is not how to eliminate grief but how to gradually build a life capable of containing grief alongside other experiences.

The Dual Movement of Grieving

One of the most helpful contemporary ideas about bereavement is that grieving does not require constant emotional confrontation with the loss. Stroebe and Schut's Dual Process Model proposes that people oscillate between loss-oriented coping and restoration-oriented coping. Loss-oriented experiences involve attending directly to the death and its emotional consequences, while restoration-oriented experiences involve adapting to the practical and psychological changes created by the loss. Healthy coping involves movement between these orientations rather than remaining permanently immersed in either one.

This model helps explain why someone can cry while looking through photographs in the morning and laugh genuinely with a friend that evening. The laughter does not invalidate the grief. Likewise, moments of intense sadness after a period of relative stability do not necessarily mean the person has “gone backward.” Human beings cannot remain continuously focused on loss, and temporary respite can be part of adaptation.

Art therapy can reflect this oscillation rather than demanding that every session be emotionally intense. One week, a client may create a memory collage centered entirely on the person who died. Another week, the art may be about reorganizing the bedroom, imagining a future trip, or representing the uncertainty of taking over responsibilities the deceased once handled. Both can belong to grief work.

This matters because therapy can sometimes become unintentionally narrow. If every session asks the bereaved person to revisit the death, talk about painful memories, or produce emotionally heavy artwork, the person may begin to feel that suffering is required to demonstrate that they are grieving properly. A broader approach allows art-making to hold both mourning and restoration: sorrow and ordinary life, memory and change, absence and emerging possibility.

Memory Collage: Building a Relationship With What Remains

Collage is particularly useful in grief work because memory itself is fragmentary. We do not remember another person as a single continuous story. We remember pieces: a phrase they always used, the pattern of a favorite shirt, the smell of a particular meal, a holiday, an argument, a song, an expression on their face, the way they drove, the things that annoyed us, the things we now miss unexpectedly.

A memory collage allows these fragments to exist together without requiring the person to construct a polished biography. Photographs can be included if the client wishes, but they are not essential. Magazine images, copies of handwriting, fabric, maps, colors, printed words, ticket stubs, recipes, drawings, and symbolic objects can all represent elements of the relationship.

Consider someone grieving a grandfather who rarely spoke openly about affection. Instead of creating a sentimental memorial, the client might include an image of a toolbox, a cup of strong tea, a particular type of tree, a newspaper clipping, and the phrase “Did you check the tires?” None of these elements appears conventionally emotional, yet together they may capture the language through which care was expressed.

This kind of work can preserve specificity. Grief sometimes becomes reduced socially to the fact that someone died, while the mourner is grieving a particular person whose habits, contradictions, humor, flaws, and relational history cannot be replaced. Creative memory work allows the uniqueness of that relationship to remain visible.

It can also make room for ambivalence. A collage does not have to idealize the deceased. A client can include both tenderness and anger, beauty and difficulty. This can be especially important when the relationship was complicated, because cultural expectations often pressure mourners to speak positively about someone after death even when the actual relationship contained pain.

The Continuing-Bond Box

Another creative technique involves making a container for the ongoing relationship. This might be a decorated box, envelope, small handmade book, folder, jar, or another object chosen by the client. Inside, the person can place written memories, photocopied photographs, symbolic objects, recipes, drawings, unanswered questions, or small reminders.

The purpose is not to put the deceased “away.” In fact, the metaphor is almost the opposite. The container gives physical form to a relationship that has changed but has not become meaningless. Research and clinical literature on legacy activities have described the use of art-making, storytelling, keepsakes, and symbolic communication in helping children and families maintain meaningful connections with someone who has died.

A client might add to the container over months rather than completing it in one session. On an anniversary, they might place a new letter inside. After remembering a forgotten story, they might write it down. After becoming a parent themselves, they might add a note about suddenly understanding something their deceased mother used to say.

This evolving quality is important because grief itself evolves. The meaning of a relationship does not become frozen at the moment of death. Someone may understand their parent differently at forty than they did at twenty-five. A child who loses a parent may experience the loss differently at graduation, marriage, or the birth of their own child. Continuing bonds can therefore develop as the survivor develops.

The object becomes a place where the relationship can continue to acquire meaning without pretending the death did not occur.

Writing and Illustrating a Letter That Does Not Need an Answer

Letter writing has long been used in grief-oriented therapeutic work, and combining it with visual art can make the exercise more flexible. A client may write to the person who died, but the letter does not need to be purely affectionate or resolved. It can contain gratitude, anger, questions, apologies, ordinary updates, jokes, disappointment, or things that were never said.

After writing, the client might add images around the letter, cover parts of it, fold it into another artwork, place it in a handmade envelope, or transform certain sentences into visual symbols. Some people may prefer not to use words at all and create a visual letter consisting entirely of color, marks, objects, and images.

Imagine a woman whose sister died after years of a difficult relationship. She loves her sister and misses her, but she is also angry about unresolved conflict. A conventional memorial exercise that focuses only on cherished memories might feel dishonest. A letter can hold a more complicated truth: I wish you were here. I am still angry. I don't know what to do with the fact that we never fixed this. I remember how hard you made me laugh. I hate that I can't ask you why.

The therapeutic value does not depend on reaching forgiveness or closure by the end of the exercise. Sometimes the most respectful outcome is recognition: this relationship mattered, it contained contradictions, and some questions may remain unanswered.

That is not therapeutic failure. Some losses contain unfinished stories that cannot be neatly completed.

When the Grief Is Anger

Grief is frequently represented culturally as sadness, but anger can be equally important. People may feel angry at medical professionals, family members, themselves, God, circumstances, the person who died, or simply at the unfairness of what happened. Because anger after loss can feel socially unacceptable, it may become hidden beneath more recognizable grief.

Art materials can offer a physical way to encounter this emotion. Thick charcoal, clay, tearing paper, heavy paint, repetitive marks, and large movements can provide a different quality of expression from delicate drawing. A therapist might invite a client to show what the anger feels like rather than explain why they “should” or “should not” feel it.

The physicality of the process can matter. A client may press charcoal into the page until the stick breaks, then suddenly begin crying. Another may tear several pieces of paper and later realize that the act resembles what the death has done to the family's sense of continuity. The therapist should avoid romanticizing these moments as cathartic breakthroughs. Emotional expression does not automatically resolve distress, and intense activities must be paced according to the individual's regulation and clinical needs. Still, the art can create permission for emotions that have had no acceptable place elsewhere.

For some clients, simply seeing anger represented outside the body can make it feel more manageable. The feeling has not disappeared, but it has become something they can observe, describe, alter, or return to later.

Drawing the Relationship Before and After the Loss

Another useful approach is to explore not simply the deceased person but the relationship itself. A client might create two images: one representing the relationship when the person was alive and another representing how the relationship exists now.

The second image is especially important because it resists the assumption that the only possible post-death representation is emptiness. One person may draw a line that continues beyond a boundary. Another might represent the deceased as a color that now appears within the self. Someone may draw a shared path that divides but remains visible in the landscape. Another may show an empty chair because absence is currently the most truthful experience.

There is no preferred image.

This exercise can help clients recognize that relationships often change form rather than become psychologically nonexistent. Hospice and palliative-care literature has documented how tangible creative works can contribute to continuing bonds for patients and bereaved family members.

For a grieving client, the question “Where is this person in your life now?” may initially feel strange. Over time, however, they may recognize that a parent's values influence how they raise their children, that a friend's humor continues to shape how they see certain situations, or that the person who died remains part of their identity even while their everyday life continues to change.

Visual Journaling for Grief That Changes From Day to Day

One difficulty in grief is that people often judge themselves according to how they felt yesterday. After a relatively calm week, an intense grief reaction may feel like regression. After months of pain, an unexpectedly enjoyable day can trigger guilt. A visual journal can provide a more spacious record of these fluctuations.

The journal does not need to document every day or become another obligation. Pages can contain colors, fragments of writing, photographs, drawings, single words, pressed flowers, scribbles, or blank spaces. One entry might consist of a carefully written memory; another could simply be a gray wash across the page.

Over time, the journal may reveal that grief is not moving in a straight line but is changing in texture, frequency, context, and meaning. Certain anniversaries may intensify it. Particular places may bring comfort. Some memories may become less painful while others become newly important.

The American Art Therapy Association has highlighted visual journaling among creative methods used in grief-oriented professional practice, particularly for externalizing emotion and exploring symbolic representations of loss.

For the therapist, the journal can also help shift attention away from the question, “Are you better yet?” and toward the more meaningful question, “How is your relationship with this loss changing?”

Art for Grief That Other People Do Not Recognize

Not every grief receives social recognition. People can grieve a miscarriage, infertility, divorce, estrangement, migration, loss of health, loss of a career, the death of a pet, a relationship that was hidden from others, or a person whose role in their life was not socially understood. The CDC explicitly notes that grief can follow many forms of loss, including death, divorce, job loss, and major life changes.

When grief is not acknowledged externally, art can provide a form of witness. Someone grieving a pregnancy loss may create an image for a baby whose existence is rarely mentioned. A migrant may make a layered collage of a city they cannot return to, grieving not only a place but a former version of themselves. Someone leaving a long career may create an image of the identity that ended when the job ended.

The artwork does not need society's permission to declare that something mattered.

This is one of the quiet strengths of creative grief work. It allows the person to represent the magnitude of a loss without first having to defend why they are grieving.

When Meaning Cannot Be Found Yet

Grief therapy sometimes emphasizes meaning-making, and research associated with meaning reconstruction has contributed significantly to contemporary bereavement psychology. Loss can disrupt assumptions about identity, fairness, spirituality, relationships, and the future, and people may gradually reconstruct a workable understanding of their lives after what happened. Neimeyer's work has been especially influential in framing bereavement as a process that can involve rebuilding meaning rather than simply detaching from the deceased.

Yet there is an important therapeutic caution here: meaning should not become a demand.

A parent whose child has died may not want to explain what the death “taught” them. A person grieving a violent or preventable death may experience attempts to identify silver linings as deeply invalidating. Some events remain senseless even after people build meaningful lives around them.

Art therapy can respect this uncertainty by allowing unfinished, ambiguous, or contradictory images. A client may create something without knowing what it means. They may return to it weeks later and understand it differently. An image may remain confusing permanently.

The therapist does not need to extract a lesson from every artwork. Sometimes creating a form for pain is enough.

When the Client Does Not Want to Make Art

A grief-focused art therapy session should not become another situation in which the mourner is expected to perform correctly. Some clients will not want to draw the person who died. Others may refuse a memory activity because the loss is too fresh or because photographs feel overwhelming. Someone may choose to make something unrelated to the death altogether.

These choices can be respected.

The therapist's role is not to force emotional confrontation but to provide a sufficiently safe context in which expression is possible when the client is ready. The Dual Process Model is useful here because adaptation to bereavement includes movement away from direct attention to the loss as well as movement toward it.

A client who spends a session quietly making repetitive patterns may be regulating themselves rather than avoiding therapeutic work. Someone who wants to paint a garden instead of discussing the funeral may be engaging with restoration, beauty, memory, or simply the need for psychological respite.

Grieving people do not need to prove their love by remaining continuously immersed in pain.

Creating a Memorial Without Turning It Into a Goodbye

Memorial art can be powerful, but the way it is framed matters. If a therapist presents a memorial project as a final goodbye, the activity may create pressure for someone who does not experience the relationship as finished.

A memorial can instead be understood as recognition: This person existed. This relationship mattered. Something of it remains.

The artwork might be a small book, sculpture, textile piece, painted object, garden marker, collage, or shared family piece. Children might create memory stones or illustrated stories. Adults might incorporate handwriting, recipes, maps, photographs, music, or symbolic imagery.

Family art therapy in bereavement and pediatric palliative contexts has explored how shared creative work may support mourning, communication, and remembrance. The research remains developing, but existing studies suggest potential value in helping families express and engage with loss through creative processes.

Importantly, a memorial does not have to remain permanently displayed. The client should decide where it belongs. Some people want the artwork visible every day. Others prefer a private drawer. Some may alter it years later.

The location and evolution of the object can itself become part of the grieving process.

Making Room for Life Without Betraying the Person Who Died

One of the painful transitions in grief occurs when life begins to contain pleasure again. The first genuine laugh, enjoyable trip, new relationship, peaceful morning, or day without constant thoughts of the deceased can provoke unexpected guilt.

A client may feel that becoming happier means becoming less loyal.

Art can help explore this tension by creating a page in which grief and life are both represented. Instead of asking someone to paint “moving on,” the therapist might invite them to show what they are carrying and what is beginning to grow around it. The result might include sadness and vitality without requiring one to replace the other.

This reflects an important principle: adaptation does not necessarily require diminishing the significance of the person who died. The relationship can remain psychologically meaningful while the survivor invests in present relationships, experiences, and responsibilities.

A person can love someone who is gone and still love the life that remains.

These truths do not cancel each other.

The Therapist as Witness Rather Than Interpreter

Perhaps one of the most important elements of art therapy for grief is not the technique at all but the quality of witnessing. A grieving person's artwork may contain intensely private meanings, and therapists should be cautious about assigning interpretations that the client has not endorsed.

Rather than saying, “The dark color represents your depression,” a therapist might ask, “What does this color feel like to you?” Rather than assuming an empty chair represents abandonment, they can invite the client to describe what the chair means. The same symbol can hold completely different meanings for different people, cultures, families, and moments in the grieving process.

This stance is especially important because grief is culturally shaped. Rituals, beliefs about death, expectations regarding emotional expression, relationships with ancestors, religious understandings, and family roles all influence mourning. A continuing bond that seems unusual within one cultural framework may be entirely ordinary within another.

The therapist's task is therefore less about decoding artwork and more about accompanying the client in discovering what the artwork makes possible.

Sometimes that possibility is understanding.

Sometimes it is memory.

Sometimes it is anger.

Sometimes it is silence.

Conclusion: Grief Does Not Need to Become a Finished Story

Loss changes the shape of a life, but it does not always create a story with a clean ending. Some grief becomes quieter over time. Some returns intensely around anniversaries, milestones, places, songs, or unexpected memories. Some relationships become comforting internal presences, while others remain complicated. People can adapt deeply to loss while still missing someone decades later.

Creative grief work honors this complexity because art does not require the same kind of conclusion that ordinary narratives often demand. An image can remain ambiguous. A collage can hold contradictory memories. A letter can contain love and anger in the same paragraph. A memorial can acknowledge death while preserving connection. A visual journal can show that grief changes from one day to another without progressing through a neat sequence.

The goal is therefore not to create the perfect symbolic goodbye or use art to force someone toward closure. It is to offer a space where loss can become visible without becoming simplified. Through color, form, image, texture, memory, and symbolic objects, grieving people can encounter experiences that may otherwise remain difficult to articulate.

Sometimes healing does involve letting go of particular expectations, routines, or forms of attachment. But it does not necessarily require letting go of the person, the relationship, or the significance of what was lost. Contemporary grief research increasingly recognizes that adaptation can include continuing bonds, oscillation between mourning and restoration, and the gradual reconstruction of life around an absence that remains meaningful.

Art therapy can give that paradox somewhere to live. The person who died can be absent and present. The mourner can be heartbroken and still experience pleasure. A relationship can be over in one sense while continuing in another. A life can be permanently changed without being permanently emptied of meaning.

Perhaps this is a more compassionate way to think about grief: not as something we must eventually close, erase, or leave behind, but as an experience we gradually learn to carry differently. Art cannot remove the loss. What it can sometimes offer is a language spacious enough to hold what remains.

References

American Art Therapy Association. (n.d.). What is art therapy? American Art Therapy Association.

Haine, R. A., Ayers, T. S., Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., & Weyer, J. L. (2008). Evidence-based practices for parentally bereaved children and their families. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(2), 113–121.

Hewson, H., Galbraith, N., Jones, C., & Heath, G. (2024). The impact of continuing bonds following bereavement: A systematic review. Death Studies, 48(5), 425–441.

Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Taylor & Francis.

Lawrence, A., Guilfoyle, A., & Hunt, K. (2022). Helping children cope with loss: Legacy interventions for the classroom. Children, 9(5), 656.

Neimeyer, R. A. (Ed.). (2001). Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss. American Psychological Association.

Root, B. L., & Exline, J. J. (2014). The role of continuing bonds in coping with grief: Overview and future directions. Death Studies, 38(1–5), 1–8.

Stroebe, M., & Schut, H. (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies, 23(3), 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811899201046

Weiskittle, R. E., & Gramling, S. E. (2018). The therapeutic effectiveness of using visual art modalities with the bereaved: A systematic review. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 9–24.