Estimated Reading Time: 10-12 minutes
What You Will Learn
-
What emotional regulation actually means, beyond simply trying to calm down.
-
What research suggests about visual art therapy, coloring, and emotional well-being.
-
Seven practical expressive art exercises that can be adapted to different emotional states.
-
Why no particular material or technique automatically regulates the nervous system.
-
How imagery, metaphor, movement, and tactile materials can support reflection without requiring elaborate interpretation.
-
How to build creative practices into everyday self-care without turning them into another performance goal.
-
When emotional distress calls for professional support rather than another self-help exercise.
Emotional Regulation Is More Than Becoming Calm

Emotions are not problems that need to disappear. Fear can draw attention to threat, anger can signal perceived injustice or violation, sadness can accompany loss, and anxiety can alert us to uncertainty or anticipated difficulty. Emotional regulation involves influencing how emotions develop, how intensely they are experienced, how they are expressed, and what we do in response to them. Sometimes regulation means reducing intensity. At other times it means allowing an emotion to remain while choosing not to act impulsively, shifting attention, changing how a situation is understood, seeking support, or simply giving an experience enough time to unfold.
James Gross's influential process model describes several points at which people can regulate emotions, including selecting or modifying situations, directing attention, changing how an event is interpreted, and modifying responses. More recent versions emphasize an additional layer: we first need to recognize that regulation might be useful, select a strategy, implement it, and monitor whether it is working. This matters because no single strategy is always best. A technique that helps with mild anxiety may be frustrating during grief, while distraction that is useful during an acute crisis may become unhelpful if it is the only way someone responds to difficult emotion.
Expressive art can fit into this larger repertoire. Drawing, coloring, collage, clay, writing, and movement can redirect attention, give an experience visual form, introduce metaphor, provide sensory engagement, or create a pause before action. For some people these activities feel calming. For others, their main value is that they make an experience easier to observe. Creative work therefore does not need to “switch off” distress to be useful.
The evidence for professional visual art therapy is encouraging but should be interpreted carefully. A 2025 meta-analysis of 35 randomized trials involving 3,167 adults found significant reductions in anxiety associated with visual art therapy, but the authors rated the overall evidence as very low quality because of substantial heterogeneity and methodological limitations. A 2026 meta-analysis of 12 randomized trials involving 741 adults also found improvements in depressive and anxiety symptoms and concluded that visual art therapy has potential as an adjunctive intervention. These findings support creative approaches without proving that each exercise below is an independently validated treatment.
What Art Can Add to Emotional Regulation
Creative activity changes the form of attention. Instead of asking, “Why am I so anxious?” you might represent anxiety as color and space. Instead of trying to argue with anger, you might notice its movement through rapid marks. Instead of forcing yourself to explain sadness, you might create an image that simply acknowledges it. The benefit is not that art bypasses the rational mind or accesses a special emotional brain. Complex emotion, creativity, imagery, language, and movement depend on interacting brain systems rather than a simple division between cognitive and emotional pathways.
The same caution applies to popular “bottom-up” explanations. Sensory and motor experiences certainly contribute to emotion and attention, but rubbing clay, making repetitive marks, or moving rhythmically cannot be assumed to activate a specific calming autonomic pathway. A person may feel calmer, more focused, frustrated, energized, or unchanged. The individual's response remains more informative than a universal formula about the material.
Research on cortisol illustrates why this distinction is important. A frequently cited 2016 study found a statistically significant reduction in salivary cortisol following 45 minutes of art-making. However, the study included just 39 healthy adults, was quasi-experimental, and did not include a control group. Participants also varied considerably in their individual cortisol responses. It is therefore appropriate to say that art-making may influence stress experience and some physiological measures in certain contexts, not that art consistently regulates the stress system.
With those limits in mind, the following seven exercises can be used as experiments in attention, expression, and reflection.
1. The Color Breathing Mandala
Mandala coloring combines a clearly bounded visual task with repetitive attention. Begin with a simple circular design, either drawn yourself or printed. Choose colors according to preference rather than assigning one color to anxiety and another to calm. As you color, let your breathing remain comfortable. You can slow it slightly if that feels natural, but there is no need to synchronize each breath perfectly with each section of the drawing.
The purpose is to give attention a relatively simple task. Notice the color, movement, pressure of the pencil, and gradual filling of space. If thoughts wander, return to the section you are coloring without treating distraction as failure. When you finish, ask a practical question: “How do I feel now compared with when I began?” The answer might be calmer, more focused, unchanged, or even impatient. All are useful information.
Mandala research is promising, but it does not support presenting the activity as a guaranteed physiological regulator. A recent meta-analysis of 17 studies involving 987 hospitalized adults found reductions in anxiety and stress associated with mandala coloring. Another 2026 meta-analysis focusing on adults aged 55 and older also found favorable anxiety and depression outcomes, but heterogeneity was high and the certainty of evidence was rated very low. Mandala coloring can therefore be considered a potentially useful calming practice, not a treatment that works uniformly for everyone.
2. Emotion-to-Image Externalization

Choose one feeling or emotional state that seems important and represent it visually using color, lines, shapes, texture, size, and position. The image does not need to resemble anything recognizable. Anxiety might occupy an entire page, sadness might appear as several disconnected areas, or anger might be represented by one small concentrated mark. There are no standard meanings.
Once you finish, place the image in front of you and notice what changes when you can look at the representation rather than only experience the feeling internally. You might give the image a title or complete the sentence, “If this image could say one thing, it might say...” This does not mean that the image contains an unconscious message. The prompt simply gives you another perspective from which to reflect.
Research on affect labeling is sometimes used to explain this technique. A well-known neuroimaging experiment found that putting feelings into words while viewing emotional stimuli was associated with reduced amygdala responses and increased activity in a prefrontal region. That finding is interesting, but it involved explicit verbal labeling under experimental conditions. It does not prove that drawing an emotion automatically dampens amygdala activity. The more defensible benefit of this exercise is psychological distance and increased opportunity for observation.
3. The Comfort and Support Collage
Instead of creating a conventional “safe place,” gather images, words, textures, and colors associated with comfort, support, familiarity, steadiness, or relief. This wording is intentional. Not everyone can easily imagine a completely safe place, particularly during periods of significant stress or trauma. Asking for something that feels slightly more supportive can be more realistic.
Arrange the selected materials on a page without worrying about visual coherence. A familiar chair might sit beside a photograph of the sea, a phrase from a magazine, a color associated with a supportive person, and an image of a morning routine. When the collage is finished, ask: “Which elements here are actually available to me?” The exercise then becomes more than imagery. It can identify concrete resources.
It is better not to claim that the brain cannot distinguish vividly imagined safety from real safety. The brain is capable of differentiating imagined and perceived experiences, even though imagery can influence emotion. A collage may provide a useful reminder or attentional anchor, but it does not guarantee that the nervous system will interpret the environment as safe.
For some people, the collage may even highlight what is missing. That can be emotionally significant and may warrant support rather than further self-soothing.
4. The Scribble Transformation
Make a rapid scribble on a page for approximately ten seconds, preferably with your eyes open unless closing them feels comfortable and physically safe. Then stop and look at what you have made. Rotate the paper if you wish. Notice whether any forms, paths, spaces, or shapes attract your attention, and decide whether you want to develop one of them into something more deliberate.
The exercise introduces an unplanned starting point and then asks you to respond to it. This can be useful for people who become stuck trying to make a perfect image because the first stage requires almost no aesthetic decision-making. Transforming the scribble may also encourage flexible thinking: the original marks remain, but they can become part of something different.
That does not mean the procedure scientifically mirrors cognitive reappraisal or psychological integration. Turning a scribble into a landscape is not equivalent to changing an interpretation of a stressful event. However, the exercise can become a metaphor for flexibility if that interpretation is meaningful to you.
A useful reflection is: “What did I keep, what did I change, and what did I work around?” Sometimes the answers connect to a larger emotional issue. Sometimes they simply describe an enjoyable creative task.
5. Rhythm and Mark-Making
Choose music that feels tolerable and relevant to your present state. Rather than assuming calm music is always best, you might begin with something that matches your energy. Use a large sheet of paper and allow lines or marks to follow aspects of the rhythm, volume, pace, or movement you notice. After several minutes, you can change the music and observe whether your marks change as well.
This exercise combines listening, movement, visual attention, and choice. It may help redirect attention from repetitive thinking and make changes in pace easier to notice. The important point is to observe rather than manufacture a particular emotional outcome.
Claims that rhythmic drawing stabilizes heart-rate variability or synchronizes the autonomic nervous system are much stronger than the evidence allows. Music can influence subjective emotion and physiological variables, but responses vary substantially according to the music, person, context, and measurement method. There is no basis for assuming that drawing in rhythm will automatically improve HRV.
If music makes you more agitated, stop or change it. Emotional regulation includes recognizing when a strategy is not working and selecting another one.
6. Emotional Weather Journaling
Imagine that your current emotional experience is weather. It might be foggy, humid, windy, extremely still, stormy in one area and clear in another, or something that does not resemble ordinary weather. Draw the weather first, then add a few words describing it.
Metaphor can help because it changes the question from “What is wrong with me?” to “What is this experience like?” That difference can soften self-judgment and make complexity easier to represent. A page can contain sun and rain simultaneously, just as a person can experience relief and sadness at the same time.
After drawing, ask: “Is this weather changing, stable, or difficult to predict?” Then consider one supportive action that fits the actual situation. A storm may suggest reducing demands, while fog might suggest waiting before making a major decision. These are metaphors, not prescriptions.
Avoid forcing the idea that “all weather passes.” Some emotional difficulties persist and deserve treatment. The purpose of the metaphor is to explore experience, not persuade yourself that distress is temporary when you do not know that it is.
7. Clay and Tactile Attention
Take a piece of clay or another tactile material you comfortably tolerate and spend a moment noticing its temperature, resistance, weight, and texture. Rather than being told to “release tension” into it, experiment. Press it, roll it, flatten it, divide it, rebuild it, or create an object. You might make something representing strength, but you do not have to assign symbolic meaning at all.
Clay is often described as inherently grounding because it engages the hands and provides strong tactile input. That description may fit some people, but it should not become a universal claim. A person with tactile sensitivity may dislike clay intensely. Someone else may enjoy it but feel energized rather than calm. The therapeutic value lies in the interaction between person, material, attention, and context.
If you notice that working with clay interrupts rumination or makes you feel more present, that is useful information. If you dislike it, switch materials. A regulation strategy does not become better because it appears more “somatic.”
Building Expressive Art Into Everyday Life
A sustainable creative practice does not need to become another self-improvement program. Ten minutes of drawing one evening may be useful, while on another day walking, talking to someone, resting, exercising, or doing nothing intentional may be the better response. Flexibility matters more than maintaining a perfect creative routine.
You might keep a small collection of materials easily available and develop several options: a notebook for emotional weather, colored pencils for structured coloring, collage materials for reflective work, and clay if you enjoy tactile activity. Instead of promising yourself to use them every day, notice which strategies fit which situations. Over time you may discover that coloring helps when your thoughts are busy, visual journaling helps when emotions are difficult to name, and art feels unhelpful when you are exhausted.
That learning process is emotional regulation in practice. The extended process model emphasizes monitoring and changing strategies when necessary rather than persisting with an ineffective technique.
Expressive Art and Positive Psychology
Positive psychology offers another useful lens as long as creativity is not reduced to forced positivity. In Martin Seligman's original PERMA model, well-being includes Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment. Creative activity can intersect with several of these domains. A person may experience deep engagement while creating, use an image to explore meaning, make art with other people, or experience satisfaction from completing something personally significant.
That does not mean expressive art automatically increases PERMA or produces a state of flow. Flow requires a particular relationship between challenge, skill, attention, and experience, and many creative sessions are frustrating rather than absorbing. Positive psychology is most useful here when it broadens the purpose of creative practice beyond symptom reduction. Art does not have to exist only to calm anxiety. It can also be playful, meaningful, connecting, aesthetically satisfying, curious, or simply enjoyable.
Difficult emotion remains welcome within that framework. Emotional regulation is not the replacement of negative feelings with positive ones.
A Note on Polyvagal Explanations
Polyvagal theory has become common in wellness and expressive-arts discussions, where creative activities are sometimes described as providing cues of safety, activating the ventral vagal system, or moving people out of defensive autonomic states. Those claims should currently be treated cautiously.
A 2026 international evaluation by experts in vagal physiology, evolution, and social behavior concluded that several major neurophysiological premises of polyvagal theory are unsupported or inconsistent with the broader evidence base. This does not mean that rhythm, supportive relationships, slow breathing, music, art, or sensory practices cannot influence how people feel. It means those effects should not automatically be explained through polyvagal mechanisms.
A simpler explanation is often enough: creative activities can influence attention, behavior, sensory experience, expectation, meaning, and emotion. Researchers can continue investigating their physiological correlates without prematurely reducing them to one nervous-system theory.
When Creative Self-Regulation Is Not Enough
Expressive art exercises are complementary tools, not substitutes for assessment or treatment when distress becomes persistent or severe. Professional support is appropriate when anxiety, depression, anger, grief, trauma symptoms, or emotional instability significantly interfere with daily functioning; when attempts at self-regulation consistently increase distress; or when creative exercises begin evoking experiences that feel difficult to manage alone.
Professional art therapy is also different from doing expressive art independently. Art therapists are trained mental health professionals who integrate art-making with assessment, psychological theory, ethics, treatment planning, and the therapeutic relationship. Self-directed drawing can be valuable without needing to be called art therapy.
If an exercise becomes emotionally overwhelming, stopping is an appropriate regulation strategy. You do not have to finish the image, find its meaning, turn distress into beauty, or reach calm before putting the materials away.
Conclusion: Regulation Means Having More Options

Emotional regulation is not about controlling every feeling or returning to calm as quickly as possible. It is about having enough awareness and flexibility to respond to emotions in ways that fit the situation. Sometimes that means changing perspective. Sometimes it means accepting an emotion without acting on it. Sometimes it means shifting attention, seeking support, resting, solving a problem, or waiting.
Expressive art can add useful possibilities to that repertoire. Color can give form to something difficult to describe. Metaphor can create another perspective. Repetitive coloring may help some people focus. Clay may provide an absorbing tactile experience. A scribble can remove the demand for perfection. Music and mark-making can turn attention toward movement and rhythm. None of these strategies needs a dramatic neurological explanation to be worthwhile.
The research supports cautious optimism. Visual art therapy has shown promising effects for anxiety and depression, and mandala-based interventions have produced encouraging findings in particular populations. At the same time, study quality and results vary, and research on professional art therapy cannot automatically validate every self-directed exercise.
The most useful question is therefore not “Which art technique will regulate my nervous system?” It is “What happens when I try this, and does it help me respond to what I am feeling more effectively?”
That question leaves room for both science and individuality. It also captures something central to emotional regulation itself: the goal is not perfect calm. It is greater flexibility in how we meet what we feel.
References
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.
Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26.
Grossman, P., et al. (2026). Why the polyvagal theory is untenable: An international expert evaluation of the polyvagal theory. Clinical Neuropsychiatry.
Guo, Z., Liu, Y., Zhu, S., & He, Y. (2026). Effects of visual art therapy on depressive symptoms in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 17, 1877502.
Huang, W., et al. (2025). The effects of visual art therapy on improving anxiety symptoms in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 32(5), 1197–1210.
Kaimal, G., Ray, K., & Muniz, J. (2016). Reduction of cortisol levels and participants' responses following art making. Art Therapy, 33(2), 74–80.
Lieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J. H., & Way, B. M. (2007). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science, 18(5), 421–428.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish. Free Press.
